| The Van Tharp Institute |
August 10, 2005 � Issue #232 | |
|
Home | Workshops | Products | Contact Us |
||
|
Do Not 'Reply.' Click Here To Email Us. Tharp's Thoughts Weekly Newsletter |
Thank you for subscribing to "Tharp's Thoughts" |
Feature Article The Psychology of Your Fund Manager, By Van K. Tharp
Coming Workshops Five Premium Workshops for Traders and Investors. Sign up early and save. Trading Tip Two Smart Guys; Two Prudent Actions, By D.R. Barton, Jr.
Listening In Mechanical Trading System? Special Report Eight Page Report by Van Tharp, Does Your System Still Work in Changing Markets?
|
The Psychology of Your Fund Manager ByVan K. Tharp, Ph.D. "Okay, Van, the stock market was up again, despite the fact that the Fed has raised short term interest rates on ten straight times . If this is a bear market, why isn�t the market going down?" I often hear this question. First, it�s a sideways market. This is the eighth month of the year and two out of the three major averages are still lower than they were at the end of last year � although they are all very close. Perhaps this might continue for several years but I doubt it. My friend Steve Sjuggerud recently sent out an amazing email newsletter (www.investmentU.com, letter #458) pointing out a contrary indicator that strongly suggests that a major downturn could be right on top of us. It has to do with the attitude of major fund managers. Generally, they don�t have a clue where the market is headed because two thirds of them always fail to beat their benchmark indices. Furthermore, it�s uncanny how poor they are at timing the market. And how can you measure what they are thinking? That�s easy, just look at how fully invested they are. At the top of market, fund managers are usually fully invested. And, of course, market tops are usually followed by declines. And when fund managers have lots of cash, then the market usually does very well and goes up . Steve looked at fund manager data going back to 1970. When fund managers had more than 9.5% cash in their fund, which occurred about 20% of the time, then the stock market was up about 18% a year later.
And, since 1970, the opposite has also been true. When fund managers have very little cash, say 6% or less, then stocks do very poorly. According to Steve, fund managers had 6% cash or less about 27% of the time. And when this happened, stocks rose about 1.2% of the time over the next twelve months -- which is rather dismal performance.
However, this is only part of the story. Steve also points to an excellent analysis by Jason Goepfert (www.sentimentrader.com). Jason decided that interest rates should play a part in this as well. For example, when short term interest rates are 15%, it make sense to be in cash because markets seldom go up as much as 15% per year. But when short term rates are very low (i.e., prior to all the rate changes they were as low as 1%), then one should be in stocks because of the lack of return. According to Steve, Jason wrote a paper ( awarded a prize by the MTA ) in which he showed that about 55% of the cash level of mutual fund managers could be explained by the current interest rate. For example, they were about 10% cash in 1980 when interest rates were very high and they had very little cash when interest rates hit 1%. As a result, Goepfert came up with a formula to determine how much cash a fund should have. And right now, according to Goepfert, mutual fund managers are hold about 2% less cash than they should have based upon interest rates. This is a very low level and it typically suggests ominous results in the stock market. Is this a prediction? Can we say for sure that the market is going down soon? No, we cannot. It could go up for six months and make a new high at the end of the year. Cash rates first went below 6% in 1997 and the bull market still had three years left to run. It could go sideways for another couple of years. And it could crash soon as short-term interest rates start to get very close to long-term interest rates. However, let's look at the big picture. We see evidence for a clear primary bear market, in which we can probably expect a big loss or at least a flat market for the next 10 years or more. Oil, which affects most aspects of economic activity, is now above $60 per barrel. The market has been going up for the last six weeks and is beginning to approach new highs for the year. However, my point is that you need to be very careful at this stage. The big fund managers are bullish and that�s usually not a good sign. And what about any funds you might be in? Is your fund manager super bullish and holding very little cash. And if that�s the case, are you prepared to get out quickly should the market turn? These are just a few of the things you should think about. There are better trends out there than we are seeing in the stock market. Look at the futures market, the currency markets, and the real estate market. While many are predicting a bubble in real estate in highly speculative parts of the country, you are probably pretty safe in futures and currencies � at least if you have enough capital and practice risk control through stops and use proper position sizing to meet your objectives. But that�s another story.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Amazing
FALL 2005 WORKSHOP LINE UP
Van
Tharp's Workshops Are Known For High Quality And Value Received
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Trading Tip
Two Smart Guys; Two Prudent Actions by D. R. Barton, Jr. Some analysts just get it right more often than not. This week, I�d look to look at two of them (plus one extra, for a bonus), what they�re saying and what traders and investors might want to do about it. Smart Guy #1: Martin Barnes. Our first smart guy has a few neat distinctions. He�s an economist that I really respect (no small feat). Steve Sjuggerud is a big fan of his (he turned me on to his stuff in the first place). And Barnes will actually tell you if he doesn�t know something or hasn�t been very good at forecasting in a particular area. He�s the Economist of BCA Research in Montreal and was featured in Baron�s a couple of weekends ago. Barnes anticipates low inflation, and low returns in the stock market. He makes a compelling case for an economy with many speed bumps (my word, not his) that will keep a damper on stock returns in general (including that nasty phrase �housing bubble� � more on that with our next Smart Guy). For the general investor, I think this has significant ramifications. Broad based index fund investing will yield fairly low returns, under Barnes� scenario. And given the risk levels inherent in long-term buy and hold investing in index funds, Barnes makes me very reluctant to recommend the old �buy a good index-based mutual fund and hold it through the economic cycles� mantra of Wall Street (which is especially popular among the mutual funds). The only reasonable alternative for minimally involved investors is to take a look at sector investing where one can ride a long term trend (say in energy, health care, etc.). Smart Guy #2: Stephen Roach. Also from Barron�s, last week�s Alan Abelson article sites my favorite �big firm� economist, Stephen Roach from Morgan Stanley. Roach is almost a household name � a rock star among economists, and for good reason. He brings more bad news to those who are hoping the �housing bubble� is just a myth. One of the arguments used by the housing bulls is that the U.K. and Australia have seen corrections in their housing market and moved along just fine. Roach puts a finer point on the comparison between the U.S. housing market and the Aussie / U.K. markets. He concludes that the housing market action among our English-speaking counter-parts �tell us little about what could happen here.� I�m in the �housing bubble� camp (meaning that I believe there is one), but I�m just smart enough to know that I have no idea when we could see a downturn (or worse) in real estate. As I�ve mentioned before in this piece of cyberspace, continuing strong demand can sustain bubbles for longer than any of us suspect. I don�t think we�re in �buyer beware� mode yet, but we�re certainly in the �buyer take extra care� zone of the housing cycle. Also, �Smart Guy #1a�, Bill Gross from Pimco Funds, is worth a read this month, as always. While waxing rhapsodic about stamp collecting, Gross uses a different method to come to Martin Barnes� same conclusions about returns that can be expected over the next decade or so. His article can be found at www.pimco.com .
D. R. Barton, Jr. will be teaching the upcoming Proven Tactics of Swing Trading Course. He is the Chief Operating Officer and Risk Manager for the Directional Research and Trading hedge fund group. D. R. has been actively involved in trading, researching and teaching in the markets since 1986. D. R. has taught extensively in many investment areas including intra-day trading, swing trading, and cutting edge risk management techniques. His writing credits include co-authoring Safe Strategies for Fin-ancial Fre-edom and co-creator and contributing author on Fin-ancial Fre-edom Through Electronic Day Trading
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Do Not Reply to This Email using the reply button as the email is not monitored. Please click this link contact us: suggestions@iitm.com The Van Tharp
Institute does not support spamming in any way, shape or form. This is a subscription
based newsletter. If you no longer wish to subscribe, Unsubscribe
Here. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Back to top | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.
.
.
.
.
.
|
Quote of the Week "That you may retain your self-respect, it is better to displease the people by doing what you know is right, than to temporarily please them by doing what you know is wrong." ~William J.H. Boetcker |
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
|
|
NEW CONTACT INFO: ph: +1 919-466-0043 fx:
+1 919-466-0408
Mail: 102-A Commonwealth Court, Cary, NC 27511 |